Wasn’t mega-d spam separate from Canadian Pharmacy? It seemed that you and M86 suggested that they are one in the same.
Oleg Nikolaenko was arrested by the Milwaukee Fbi. How about some comparisons to his operations and news on him?

Like or Dislike: 1  0

I see some great points here and generally agree with the comments I’m reading but somethings missing in this conversation.

I get all the angst against Glavmed, I’ve lost count of how many 1000′s of emails have gone into junk mail after new tactics defeated my automatic junk filtering on 20+ email addies. I’ve likely lost 100+ hours between junking them and adjusting rules, I’d love to sue GlavMed for all my lost productivity as a result of them spamming Viagra emails at a man who’s only problem getting it on is getting the kids to bed before their mom for the night.

What seems to be absent from the conversation is the question: If these a##holes abuse servers and service levels everywhere knowingly breaching policies and laws worldwide, hacking websites, defeating search engines and sending unwanted spam email, can we trust their medical practices given they seem to have no ethical standards?

Ethical drug companies test their meds for consistency in dosing, does Glavmed?

Ethical drug companies only sell high risk meds by prescription. This is because drugs like Viagra have serious side effects for people with certain pre-existing conditions. Needing a prescription means, you have to get one from a doctor, who will presumably order any needed tests to ensure you can safely take the med in question. Does Glavmed require a prescription? If so how do they scrutinize the validity of said prescription in order to ensure the safety of the patient?

Ethical drug companies have established limits with government and pharmacies as to how many of a given med can be sold to one patient in a given time frame to help avoid abuse and redistribution. Does Glavmed participate in any of these agreements or just ship wholesale to anyone with the means to buy?

Like or Dislike: 2  2

This was shown by the Sophists back in the day & every philosophy student learns of how they used semantics and wordplay to make nonsense seem useful and make other persons statements (e.g. Krebs’) seem flawed, even if they weren’t. Like the controversy over his use of “generate,” for instance… Imho, grammar police are modern day sophists with less range.

Like or Dislike: 4  2

I guess that’s my point. They aren’t giving the money to an established charity that is subject to outside scrutiny. They are visiting the orphanages personally, bringing desperately needed supplies like disposable diapers to staff members so short of funds that they’re reusing disposable gloves. I’m sure that the staff at those institutions are so grateful they feel these guys could do no wrong. It could be completely altruistic, for the pure joy of helping children. But largesse equals access, and child molesters like John Wayne Gacy have used the same technique.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 6  1

Unfortunately no.
You can not fix Your karma by doing charities for children when You are a child pornographer. Its plain sick.

And yes, on Darkmasters.info, when it was operating, they used to do charity for children as well.

I always wondered do actually orphanages realise where funds come from? Some things in life are just sad.

Hot debate. What do you think? 5  9